The Price of Freedom: Compensation upon Divorce as a Means of Ensuring Justice for the Breach of «Marital Obligations»

Author information:

Oksana Ponomarenko
PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law Disciplines and Labour Law named after Prof. O. I. Protsevskyi H. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University Kharkiv, Ukraine
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6394-1834

Keywords: marriage, family relations, compensation, moral damage, family contract, justice, divorce, liability

Download PDF
Обкладинка. 9-й випуск

Abstract

The article is devoted to a comprehensive study of the legal nature of compensation upon divorce as a tool for ensuring justice and protecting the legitimate expectations of spouses. The relevance of the work is determined by the liberalization of divorce proceedings, which, while guaranteeing absolute freedom of divorce, leaves socially and economically unprotected the party who sacrificed their professional development for the sake of the family. The use of the economic theory of understanding marriage allowed proving that the conscious refusal of one of the spouses from career growth in favor of running a household leads to the irretrievable loss of their human capital. It is substantiated that the reimbursement of these economic losses acts exclusively as a measure of protection based on the principle of distributive justice. Since the current legislation of Ukraine provides only fragmentary judicial mechanisms for leveling such an imbalance, contractual regulation is recognized as the optimal tool for mitigating risks, allowing spouses to preventively consolidate material guarantees. Special attention is paid to the compensation of moral damage, which is considered as a measure of civil liability based on the principle of corrective justice. It is proved that the basis for its recovery is not the very fact of family breakdown or the initiation of divorce, but exclusively proven culpable behavior (adultery, psychological abuse, humiliation of dignity), qualified as a tort and a direct encroachment on the personal non-property rights of a person. The analysis of the advanced law enforcement experience of France, Turkey, and the People’s Republic of China confirms the expediency and effectiveness of applying tort claims between spouses upon divorce. As a result of the study, the conceptual inconsistency of the draft Civil Code of Ukraine, which protects the expectations of persons upon the termination of an engagement but ignores the deep suffering of spouses upon the destruction of a long-term union, is revealed. A conclusion is formulated on the necessity of a systematic implementation into the national legislation of clear algorithms for the monetization of lost human capital upon divorce and the expansion of grounds for tort liability for the violation of the fundamental personal rights of a spouse.

How to Cite

In accordance with DSTU 8302:2015:
Пономаренко О. Ціна свободи: компенсація при розірванні шлюбу як форма забезпечення спаведливості за порушення «подружніх зобовʼязань». Цивілістична платформа. 2026. № 2 (9). С. 125-150. https://doi.org/10.69724/2786-8834-2026-9-2-125-150

According to the international style of APA:
Ponomarenko, O. (2026) The Price of Freedom: Compensation upon Divorce as a Means of Ensuring Justice for the Breach of «Marital Obligations». С. P. Journal, 2 (9). https://doi.org/10.69724/2786-8834-2026-9-2-125-150 [in Ukrainian].

References

  1. Bodnar T, ‘Some problem aspects of implementation and protection of property rights of spouses’ (2020) 27(1) Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine 36
  2. Boele-Woelki K and others (eds), Principles of European Family Law Regarding Divorce and Maintenance Between Former Spouses (Intersentia 2004)
  3. Borovikovskiy AL, Otchet sudi: (Sud i semia) [Judge’s Report: (Court and Family)] (Tipografiia AS Suvorina 1892)
  4. Brinig MF and Carbone J, ‘The Reliance Interest in Marriage and Divorce’ (1988) 62(5) Tulane Law Review 855
  5. Cherneha V, Bohdanets A and Kononets O, ‘Forms and ways of defending family rights and interests in Ukraine’ (2022) 11(49) Amazonia Investiga 189
  6. Cohen L, ‘Marriage, Divorce, and Quasi Rents; Or, “I Gave Him the Best Years of My Life”‘ (1987) 16(2) The Journal of Legal Studies 267
  7. Dzera OV, Vybrane. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Kyivska shkola tsyvilistyky [Selected Works. Collection of Scientific Papers. Kyiv School of Civil Law] (Yurinkom Inter 2016)
  8. Ferrant G, Pesando LM and Nowacka K, ‘Unpaid Care Work: The Missing Link in the Analysis of Gender Gaps in Labour Outcomes’ (2014)
  9. Jin Z, ‘Legal Thoughts on the Divorce Damage Compensation System’ (2020) 416 Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 680
  10. Kany WS, ‘Compensation for Financing a Spouse’s Education: The Means of Economic Justice in Maine’ (1983) 35(2) Maine Law Review 341
  11. Kharytonov YeO, Narysy teorii tsyvilistyky (poniattia ta kontsepty): monohrafiia [Essays on the Theory of Civil Law (Concepts and Constructs): Monograph] (Feniks 2008)
  12. Kolisnyk OV, ‘Nalezhni sposoby zakhystu u spravakh pro rozpodil maina podruzhzhia’ [Appropriate Means of Protection in Cases on the Division of Spouses’ Property] in Aktualni problemy simeinogo prava: materialy II mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Pravo 2025) 50
  13. Krasytska LV, ‘Problemi zdiisnennia ta zakhystu osobystykh ta mainovykh prav batkiv i ditei: monohrafiia’ [Problems of Exercising and Protecting the Personal and Property Rights of Parents and Children: Monograph] (Lira-K 2014)
  14. Krasytska LV, ‘Problemni pytannia kompensatsii moralnoi shkody yurydychnoi osoby’ [Problematic Issues of Compensation for Moral Damage to a Legal Entity] in Zhornokui YuM and Krasytska LV (eds), Suchasni problemy tsyvilnogo prava ta protsesu: navch. posib. (Pravo 2017) 269
  15. Krasytska LV, ‘Sposoby zakhystu simeinykh prav ta interesiv: naukova spadshchyna I. V. Zhylinkovoi ta suchasni problemy pravozastosuvannia’ [Methods of Protection of Family Rights and Interests: Scientific Heritage of I. V. Zhylinkova and Modern Problems of Law Enforcement] in Aktualni problemy simeinogo prava: materialy II mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Pravo 2025) 53
  16. Mendzhul MV, Pryntsypy simeinogo prava (sutnist ta problemy zastosuvannia) [Principles of Family Law (Essence and Problems of Application)] (Vydavnytstvo Oleksandry Harkushi 2019)
  17. Mendzhul MV, ‘Pryntsypy pravovogo reguliuvannia simeinykh vidnosyn u Velykobrytanii ta Irlandii’ [Principles of Legal Regulation of Family Relations in Great Britain and Ireland] (2018) 36(2) Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnogo gumanitarnogo universytetu. Ser.: Yurysprudentsiia 42
  18. Mendzhul MV, ‘Teoretychni problemy dii pryntsypiv simeinogo prava’ [Theoretical Problems of the Operation of Family Law Principles] (Doctoral thesis, Uzhhorod National University 2020)
  19. Miao C, ‘A Study on the Reasonableness of Housework Compensation from a Comparative Law Perspective’ (2024) 18(4) Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science 6
  20. Parkman AM, ‘Bringing Consistency to the Financial Arrangements at Divorce’ (1998) 87(1) Kentucky Law Journal 51
  21. Pokrovskiy IA, Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava [Main Problems of Civil Law] (Pravo 1917)
  22. Ponomarenko O, ‘Kompensatsiia v simeinomu pravi: formy urivniuvalnoi ta rozpodilnoi spravedlyvosti’ [Compensation in Family Law: Forms of Corrective and Distributive Justice] in Spasybo-Fatieieva IV (ed), Traktat pro kompensatsiiu v pravi: monohrafiia (ECUS 2026) 210
  23. Prystupa SN, ‘Poniatiinaia sushchnost i metodologicheskoe znachenie kompensatsionnoi funktsii grazhdanskogo prava’ [Conceptual Essence and Methodological Significance of the Compensatory Function of Civil Law] (1996) 31 Problemy zakonnosti 75
  24. Rolz D [Rawls J], Teoriia spravedlyvosti [A Theory of Justice] (Mokrovolskyi O tr, Osnovy 2001)
  25. Rozhon OV, Dohovory u simeinomu pravi [Contracts in Family Law] (In Yure 2018)
  26. Shen Y and Shang J, ‘How Valuable Is “Fairness”?-The Logic of Fairness in the Distribution of Property among Urban Chinese Couples in Contemporary China’ (2023) 38(3) Sociological Studies 135
  27. Spasybo-Fateyeva IV (ed), (2021)Civil Law (General Part): Course of Lectures. EC
  28. Spasybo-Fateyeva, I.V. (2020) General Overview of the Understanding of the Concept of the Right of Expectation and its Significance for the Protection of Persons’ Property Rights in Spasybo-Fatieieva IV (ed), Pravomirni ochikuvannia: st. ECUS 145
  29. Spasybo-Fateyeva, I.V. Word of the Editor-in-Chief (2025) 2(5) C 4
  30. Stefanchuk, M.O. & Muzyka-Stefanchuk, O.A. ‘Kompensatsiia moralnoi shkody u spravakh na povahu do svoho zhytla: praktyka Ukrainy ta YeSPL’ [Compensation for Moral Damage in Cases of Respect for One’s Home: Practice of Ukraine and the ECtHR] (2024) 32 Akademichni vizii
  31. Stefanchuk, R.O. (2008) Personal Non-Property Rights of Individuals (Concept, Content, System, Features of Implementation and Protection): Monograph. KNT.
  32. Xia, Y. ‘Human Rights Connotation of Improving the Economic Compensation System for Divorce Housework in the Civil Code’ (2020) 2 Human Rights Research
  33. Yakubivskyi, I. Compensation for the Violation of Intellectual Property Rights: Problems of Theory and Practice (2019) 1 Pravo Ukrainy 256
  34. Zhornokui, Yu.M. & Krasytska, L.V. (eds), Suchasni problemy tsyvilnogo prava ta protsesu: navch. posib. [Modern Problems of Civil Law and Procedure: Study Guide] (Pravo 2017)
  35. Zhu, H. ‘Law-Economics Analysis of Financial Compensation for Divorce’ (2023) 25 Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media 1
  36. Zhylinkova, I.V. Rastorzhenie braka [Dissolution of Marriage] (Ksilon 2006)
  37. Zhylinkova, I.V. (ed), Family Code: Scientific and Practical Commentary (Ksylon 2008)