Abstract
The relevance of this study is обусловлена the rapid digitalization of social relations and the absence of a natural mechanism of forgetting in the digital environment, which results in the prolonged accessibility of personal information and an increased risk to private life, human dignity, and an individual’s ability to achieve social reintegration. This issue acquires particular significance in view of the need to balance the right to privacy with freedom of expression and the public interest. The purpose of the study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the right to be forgotten as an element of the system of personal non-property rights and to determine its legal nature, content, functional purpose, implementation mechanisms, and limits in the context of the digital age. The methodological framework of the research is based on general scientific and special legal methods, including the dialectical method, the formal-legal method, the systemic- structural method, the comparative legal method, as well as the method of analysis of judicial practice.Results. The study analyzes the transformation of the right to private life in the context of digitalization; examines the genesis and legal nature of the right to be forgotten; determines its place within the system of personal non-property rights; reveals the objective and subjective content of the right to be forgotten; analyzes its correlation with freedom of expression and the public interest; and explores the right to be forgotten as a temporal right and as a legal means of individual reintegration.Conclusions. The article may be of interest to scholars and practitioners in the fields of civil and information law, as well as to professionals dealing with personal data protection in the digital environment.
How to Cite
In accordance with DSTU 8302:2015:
Спасибо-Фатєєва І. Саган Т. Право на забуття в цифрову епоху: теоретико-правовий аналіз, міжнаодна практика та механізми реалізації. Цивілістична платформа. 2026. № 1 (8). С. 89-112. https://doi.org/10.69724/2786-8834-2026-8-1-89-112
According to the international style of APA:
Spasybo-Fateyeva, I., Sahan T. (2026) The Right to Be Forgotten in the Digital Age: Theoretical and Legal Analysis, International Practice, and Implementation Mechanisms. С. P. Journal, 1 (8). https://doi.org/10.69724/2786-8834-2026-8-1-89-112 [in Ukrainian].
References
-
Ambrose, M. L. (2013). It’s about time: Privacy, information lifecycles, and the right to be forgotten. Stanford Technology Law Review, 16(2), 369–422.
-
Andrade, N. N. G. (2014). Oblivion: The right to be different… the right to be forgotten. In A. Ghezzi, Â. G. Pereira, & L. Vesnić-Alujević (Eds.), The ethics of memory in a digital age (pp. 65–81). Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Boiko, A. M. (2018). The right to be forgotten: Some theoretical and practical aspects. Journal of Eastern European Law, 48, 45–53.
-
Castellano, P. S. (2012). The right to be forgotten under European law: A constitutional debate. Lex Electronica, 16(1), 1–30. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2176814
-
Erdos, D. (2021). The right to be forgotten beyond the EU: An analysis of wider G20 regulatory action and potential next steps. Journal of Media Law, 13(1), 1–28.
-
European Convention on Human Rights. (1950, November 4). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004
-
General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_008-16
-
Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD), Mario Costeja González, Case C-131/12 (Court of Justice of the European Union, May 13, 2014). https://eur-lex.europa.eu
-
Hurbain v. Belgium, Application No. 57292/16 (European Court of Human Rights, July 4, 2023).https://hudoc.echr.coe.int
-
Jankélévitch, V. (2005). Forgiveness. University of Chicago Press.
-
Jones, M. L. (2018). Ctrl + Z: The right to be forgotten. NYU Press.
-
Kalitenko, O. M. (2019a). The right to be forgotten: European achievement or global trend? Journal of Civil Law Studies, 35, 60–67.
-
Kalitenko, O. M. (2019b). The right to be forgotten: History, modernity, prospects. In I. V. Spasybo-Fatieieva (Ed.), The right to be forgotten (pp. 45–58). EKUS.
-
Kiryak, O. V. (2021). The right to be forgotten: Not to forget the essential. In I. V. Spasybo-Fatieieva (Ed.), The right to be forgotten (pp. 12–24). EKUS.
-
Kodinets, A. O. (2021). The right to be forgotten in the system of information rights. In I. V. Spasybo-Fatieieva (Ed.), The right to be forgotten (pp. 96–108). EKUS.
-
Lytvynenko, A. (2019). Implementation of the right to be forgotten in the context of erasure of personal data related to criminal convictions or suspicions: Case law of the ECtHR and U.S. courts. Journal of Kyiv University of Law, 4, 379–389.
-
Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2011). Delete: The virtue of forgetting in the digital age. Princeton University Press.
-
M.L. and W.W. v. Germany, Applications Nos. 60798/10 and 65599/10 (European Court of Human Rights, June 28, 2018). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int
-
Otradnova, O. O. (2021). The right to be forgotten through the prism of classical tort law. In I. V. Spasybo-Fatieieva (Ed.), The right to be forgotten (pp. 59–71). EKUS.
-
Peck v. the United Kingdom, Application No. 44647/98 (European Court of Human Rights, January 28, 2003).https://hudoc.echr.coe.int
-
Popovych, T. P. (2021). Substantive aspects of the right to be forgotten. In I. V. Spasybo-Fatieieva (Ed.), The right to be forgotten (pp. 25–37). EKUS.
-
Posykaliuk, O. O. (2021). Balancing the right to be forgotten and freedom of expression: Case law of the CJEU and ECtHR. In I. V. Spasybo-Fatieieva (Ed.), The right to be forgotten (pp. 109–121). EKUS.
-
Posykaliuk, O. (2019). Scholarly commentary on the CJEU decision in Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v. AEPD and Mario Costeja González. Law of Ukraine, 4, 210–212.
-
Radeiko, R. I. (2021). The right to privacy in social networks. In I. V. Spasybo-Fatieieva (Ed.), The right to be forgotten (pp. 122–134). EKUS.
-
Razmetaieva, Y. S. (2018). Formation of new human rights under the influence of IT. In IT law: Problems and prospects of development in Ukraine (Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific and Practical Conference, Lviv).
-
Rustad, M. L., & Kulevska, S. (2015). Reconceptualizing the right to be forgotten to enable transatlantic data flow. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 28(2), 349–417.
-
Von Hannover v. Germany (No. 2), Applications Nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08 (European Court of Human Rights, February 7, 2012). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int
-
Węgrzynowski and Smolczewski v. Poland, Application No. 33846/07 (European Court of Human Rights, July 16, 2013). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int
-
Council of Europe. (1950, November 4). European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Retrieved January 29, 2026, from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text
-
“On Personal Data Protection” (2010, June 1). Law of Ukraine No. 2297-VI. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2297-17
-
Council of Europe. (1950, November 4). European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. (accessed: 29.11.2026) https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text
-
Civil Code of Ukraine (2003, January 16). Law of Ukraine No. 435-IV. Retrieved January 29, 2026, from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15 (accessed: 02.11.2025) [in Ukrainian].