Abstract
The study’s relevance is due to the adaptation of the mechanisms of legal regulation of procedural relations in Ukraine to the law of the European Union. The study aims to identify the forms and rules for collecting and presenting evidence in civil and commercial cases under the law of the European Union – research methods. Primary sources were studied in writing the article, including the European Union legislation. Scientific works of foreign authors devoted to individual aspects of the problem under study were analyzed. Achieving the outlined goal was made possible through the use of a complex of methods of scientific knowledge, in particular philosophical (Aristotelian), general scientific (descriptive, systemic, comparative, structural- functional), as well as special (developed by non-legal sciences, in particular, the analysis of written legal sources, cybernetic) and individual (developed by legal sciences: formal-dogmatic and special-legal) methods. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that this article is one of the first comprehensive studies of the features of collecting and presenting evidence in civil and commercial cases in the European Union. Results. The features of collecting and presenting evidence in civil and commercial cases according to the rules established in the European Union have been studied. The need to consider these features in Ukraine’s procedural legislation and practice of application has been substantiated. Conclusions. The European Union consistently introduces innovative technologies into all spheres of life, as well as the digitalization of economic and judicial processes. Using electronic, remote technologies in civil and commercial cases should ensure the necessary level of security while collecting and receiving evidence. Unlike the procedural legislation of Ukraine and the practice of its application, a decentralized IT system is used to collect and receive evidence in civil and commercial cases in the European Union to simplify and increase the efficiency of judicial processes, as well as to ensure greater legal certainty.
How to Cite
In accordance with DSTU 8302:2015:
Гнатів О., Сеник С. Подання і збирання доказів. Практика Європейського Союзу. Цивілістична платформа. 2025. № 1 (4). С. 90-101. https://doi.org/10.69724/2786-8834-2025-4-1-90-101
According to the international style of APA:
Hnativ, O. Senyk, S (2025) Submission and Taking of Evidence: Practice of the European union. С. P. Journal, 1 (4). https://doi.org/10.69724/2786-8834-2025-4-1-90-101 [in Ukrainian].
References
- Explore high-skilled Ukrainian tech companies ready to collaborate. (2025) Code.UA. https://codeua.com/ [in English]
- European Parliament and of the Council (2020, November 25) Regulation (EU) 2020/1783 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters (taking of evidence). https:// eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32020R1783 [in English]
- Kozlowska-Rautiainen, D. (2016, September 16). Obtaining Documents From the Opponent in International Commercial Arbitration. Unigrafia Helsinki. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3482448 [in English]
- Kramer, Xandra E. (2022, January 10). Digitising Access to Justice: The Next Steps in the Digitalisation of Judicial Cooperation in Europe Revista General de Derecho Europeo 56 http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4034962 [in English]
- European Parliament and of the Council (2021, December 01) Proposal for a regulation COM (2021) 759 final 2021/0394 (COD) on the digitalisation of judicial cooperation and access to justice in cross-border civil, commercial and criminal matters, and amending certain acts in the field of judicial cooperation. https:// eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0759 [in English]
- Advancing Europe’s digital decade. The EU: pioneering the way to a safe and trusted digital world. https://state-of-the-union.ec.europa.eu/state-union-2022/state-union- achievements/advancing-europes-digital-decade_en [in English]
- Nowak, M. (2024). Electronic Evidence in Civil Proceedings on the Background of Comparative Law. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia. 33, 2 http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/ sil.2024.33.2.223–237 [in English]
- Supreme Court (2023, June 21), Resolution in case No916/3027/21. https:// reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/112088045 [in Ukrainian]
- Nozomi Tada (2023). Introducing Information Technology to the Japanese Code of Civil Procedure and Cross-Border Service of Process and Examination of Evidence. YOKOMIZO, D., TOJO, Y., & NAIKI, Y. (Eds.). (2023). Changing Orders in International Economic Law. 2: A Japanese Perspective (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003193104 [in English]
- Ontanu, E. A. (2022). Normalising the use of electronic evidence: Bringing technology use into a familiar normative path in civil procedure, Oсati Socio-Legal Series, 12(3), pp. 582–613. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1304 [in English]
- Tran, Q. A. (2022). The Authentication of Electronic Evidence. In: Electronic Evidence in Civil and Commercial Dispute Resolution. European Yearbook of International Economic Law, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18572-4_7 [in English]
- Bustamante Rúa, M. M. & Galvis Lugo, Б. F. (2021). The Evaluation of Electronic and Documentary Evidence in the Civil Sphere: Differences and Implications. Law, State and Telecommunications Review, 13, 2, https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr. v13i2.37266 [in English]
- Chvankin, S. (2021). JUDICIAL PROVING IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN THE AGE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES. Evropsky Politicky a Pravni Diskurz, 8 (3), pp. 160–168. DOI 10.46340/eppd.2021.8.3.21 [in English]
- Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part. OJ L 161, 29.5.2014, p. 3–2137. https:// eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2014/295/oj [in English]
- European Parliament and of the Council (2014, July 23) Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/ eli/reg/2014/910/oj/eng [in English]
- Supreme Court (2024 January 8) Resolution in case No523/12826/19. https:// reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/116234817 [in Ukrainian]
- Supreme Court (2024, November 21) Resolution in the case No 463/615/13 https:// reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/123241755 [in Ukrainian]