On fair compensation and joint and several liability in the squeeze- out procedure

Olena Belianevych

Author information
ORCID ID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2590-2807

Published: 03.12.2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.69724/2786-8834-2024-3-3-125-147

Keywords: fair compensation, squeeze-out, monetary obligation, tort obligation, conditionality obligation, joint and several liability, removal of corporate veil, protecting the rights of minority shareholders.

Download PDF
About journal

Abstract

Based on the current law enforcement practice of the Supreme Court, the article examines the doctrinal issues of ensuring the right of minority shareholders to fair compensation in the procedure of mandatory sale of shares at the request of a person (persons acting jointly) who owns a dominant controlling stake. The author defines the legal nature of the obligation (duty) to pay compensation for shares based on the results of mandatory sale of shares in the squeeze- out procedure as a monetary obligation arising on the basis of a complex legal fact, the composition of which (actions performed by squeeze-out participants in a certain sequence and order) is determined directly by the Law of Ukraine ’On Joint Stock Companies’. The author also argues that the failure of the applicant (an authorised person of the owner of the dominant controlling stake or a group of persons acting jointly) to comply with this legal obligation causes damage to the property of minority shareholders is an offence and is covered by the concept of general tort. If the compulsory sale of shares was carried out in the interests of a group of persons acting in concert and holding a dominant controlling interest, the obligation to pay fair compensation for the shares in the squeeze-out procedure should be imposed on the entire economic group, including the ultimate beneficial owner, as all of these persons should be treated as joint and several debtors in an indivisible monetary obligation. Fulfilment of such an obligation by one of the joint and several debtors is a proper fulfilment of the monetary obligation to pay fair compensation for shares and terminates it. The author proves that the provisions of Chapter 83 of the Civil Code of Ukraine on acquisition and retention of property without sufficient legal basis are subsidiarily applied to the tort liabilities arising out of damage caused to shareholders as a result of mandatory sale of shares at a price which does not correspond to their fair value.

How to Cite

In accordance with DSTU 8302:2015:
Беляневич О. Про справедливу компенсацію та солідарну відповідальність у процедурі сквіз-ауту. Цивілістична платформа. 2024. № 3. С. 125-147. https://doi.org/10.69724/2786-8834-2024-3-3-125-147

According to the international style of APA:
Belianevych, O. (2024) On fair compensation and joint and several liability in the squeeze-out procedure. С. P. Journal, 3. https://doi.org/10.69724/2786-8834-2024-3-3-125-147 [in Ukrainian].

References

  1. Belianevych, O. A. (2022.) On the remedies of the judicial protection of rights of a minority shareholder in the procedure of compulsory shares repurchase ECONOMICS AND LAW. 2. 3–12 https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2022.02.003[in Ukrainian].
  2. Birukov, I. A., & Zaika, Yu. O. (Eds.). (2014). Civil Law of Ukraine: General Part K.: Alerta. [in Ukrainian].
  3. Chepys, O. I. (2016). The legal nature of obligations arising from unjust enrichment]. Naukhovyi visnyk Uzhhorods’koho natsional’noho universytetu. Seriia: Pravo, 41(1) [in Ukrainian].
  4. Civil Code of Ukraine (2003, January 16.). Law of Ukraine No435‐IV. https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435–15#Text [in Ukrainian].
  5. Commercial and Procedural Code of Ukraine (1991, November 6) No. 1798‐XII. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798–12?lang=en#Text [in Ukrainian].
  6. Commercial Code of Ukraine (2003, January 16.). No436‐IV. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/ 436–15#Text (accessed: 02.11.2024) [in Ukrainian]
  7. Constitutional Court of Ukraine (2012, Jenuary 25) Decision in case No1–11/2012 https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v003p710-12#Text [in Ukrainian].
  8. Dzera, O. V., Kuznietsova, N. S., & Luts’, V. V. (Eds.). (2019). Scientific and practical commentary on the Civil Code of Ukraine: in 2 volumes. Vol. 2. (6th ed., revised and expanded). Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter [in Ukrainian].
  9. European Court of Human Rights. (2004, November 2) Judgment in case Trehubenko proty Ukrainy https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_355#Text [in Ukrainian].
  10. European Parliament and Council. (2004, April 21). On takeover bids. Directive 2004/25/ EC https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex% 3A32004L0025 Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (2021 December 14) Resolution in case No643/21744/19 https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/102419275 [in Ukrainian]. Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (2024, February 7) Resolution in caseNo910/3831/22 https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/117340690 [in Ukrainian].
  11. Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court. (2020, November 24) Resolution in case No908/137/18 https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/93336732 [in Ukrainian].
  12. Kolohoida, O. V. (2023). Legal Grounds for Joint and Several Liability of Corporate Group Members in Disputes on Mandatory Sale of Shares (Squeeze-Out): the Doctrine of «Lifting the Corporate Veil» (Based on Court Practice) Pravo Ukrainy. No8. [in Ukrainian].
  13. Makhinchuk, V. M. (2017). Lifting the corporate veil: A monograph. Ivano-Frankivsk: Fol’iant. [in Ukrainian].
  14. Makhinchuk, V. M. (2024). Implementation of the instruments of the «lifting the corporate veil» doctrine in judicial practice: A monograph. Academician F. G. Burchak Scientific Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship of the NALS of Ukraine Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
  15. On Prevention and Counteraction to Legalisation (Laundering) of Criminal Proceeds, Terrorist Financing and Financing of Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (2019, December 6) Law of Ukraine No. 361‐IX https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/361–20?lang=en#Text [in Ukrainian].
  16. On Securities and Stock Market (2006, February 23) Law of Ukraine No 3480‐IV https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3480–15?lang=en#Text [in Ukrainian].
  17. Otradnova, O. (2010). General delict in civil law: Liability or obligation. Research problems. Pro ukrains’ke pravo. Chasopys kafedry teorii ta istorii derzhavy i prava Kyiv. nats. un-tu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka., 5 [in Ukrainian].
  18. Otradnova, O. O. (2009). Non-contractual obligations in civil law of Ukraine: A textbook. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter. [in Ukrainian].
  19. Pro aktsionerni tovarystva [On joint-stock companies] (2022 July 27) Law of Ukraine No 2465‐IX. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2465–20#Text (accessed: 05.11.2024) [in Ukrainian].
  20. Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo pidvyshchennia rivnia korporatyvnoho upravlinnia v aktsionernykh tovarystvakh [On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Improving Corporate Governance in Joint Stock Companies] (2017, Mach 23) Law of Ukraine No 1983- VIII https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1983–19?lang=en#Text [in Ukrainian].
  21. Romaniuk, Ya. M., & Maistreiko, L. O. (2014). Restitution, vindication, condiction, compensation: Specific aspects of relation and differentiation] Visnyk Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy, 10 [in Ukrainian].
  22. Ruban, O. O. (2020). Realizatsiia kompensatsiinoi funktsii v tsyvil’nomu pravi [Implementation of the compensatory function in civil law]. Naukovy visnyk Uzhhorods’koho natsional’noho universytetu. Seriia: Pravo, 61(1), 81 [in Ukrainian].
  23. Spasibo-Fatieieva, I. V., Sibilev, M. N., & Yarozytskyi, V. L. (Eds.). (2014). Kharkov civil law school: Protection of subjective civil rights and interests: A monograph. Kharkоv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].
  24. Spasybo-Fatyeyeva, I. (Ed.). (2022). Civil law (special part). Course of lectures: textbook. Kharkiv: EKUS. [in Ukrainian].
  25. Spasybo-Fatyeyeva, I. V. (Ed.). (2021). Civil Law (General Part): Course of Lectures. EKUS. [in Ukrainian].
  26. Spasybo-Fatyeyeva, I. V. (Ed.). (2021). Corporate law through the prism of judicial practice: A monograph. EKUS. [in Ukrainian].
  27. Spasybo-Fatyeyeva, I. V., Glotov, S. O., Zozuliak, O. I., et al. (Eds.). (2024). Unilateral transactions: A monograph. EKUS. [in Ukrainian].
  28. Supreme Court (2021, February 18) Resolution in case No908/3492/19. https:// reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/95240533 [in Ukrainian].
  29. Supreme Court (2022, July 5) Resolution in case No914/1804/18// https:// reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/105389857 [in Ukrainian].
  30. Supreme Court (2022, February 14) Resolution in case No646/4738/19 https:// reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/103886443 [in Ukrainian].
  31. Supreme Court (2022, February 14) Resolution in case No646/4738/19. https:// reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/103886443 [in Ukrainian].
  32. Supreme Court (2022, June 15) Resolution in case No905/671/19 https:// reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104987465 [in Ukrainian].
  33. Supreme Court (2022, June 15) Resolution in case No905/671/19 https:// reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104987465 [in Ukrainian].
  34. Supreme Court (2024, October 08) Ruling u cpravi No910/8714/18 https:// reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/122406968 [in Ukrainian].
  35. Supreme Court (2024, October 8)r. Ruling in case No910/8714/18 URL https:// reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/122406968 [in Ukrainian].
  36. Uhoda pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu, z odniiei storony, ta Yevropeiskym Soiuzom, Yevropeiskym spivtovarystvom z atomnoi enerhii i yikhnimy derzhavamy‐chlenamy, z inshoi storony. [Association Agreement between Ukraine, on the one hand, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their member states, on the other hand] The agreement was ratified with a statement by Law No. 1678-VII dated September 16, 2014. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_011#Text (accessed: 04.11.2024) [in Ukrainian].
© Civil Platform. All rights reserved. 2025